by Wyatt Riley
The 1994 BAOC Rankings are a mathematical concoction based on the event results. More details on these rankings and the mathematics behind them can be found in the following issues of the BAOC Bulletin: Jan/Feb 1993, Jan/Feb 1994, and Jul/Aug 1994.
Methodology
Before 1992, BAOC ranked members by course, using a system very similar to the USOF system. This year, rankings were done using a slight modification to the USOF rules (which at this point are changing). The system was still similar to the USOF rankings, with a slight change in the calculation of course difficulty and the addition of an iterative process. All Brown, Green, Red, and Blue course competitors are ranked together on an Advanced list, and there is a separate list for Orange. These rankings were done entirely by computer using an iteration rankings method. The major differences from the USOF ranking method are that everyone's result is used to determine the course difficulty, not just the top three, and that the ranking calculations are based on this year's results only (not on last year's rankings) via the use of iteration.
Who and What Gets Ranked
To be listed, you must have participated in either 3 advanced or 3 Orange courses during 1994. Everyone who did BAOC Green, Red, or Blue courses in 1994 are ranked together on the Advanced Rankings list. Orange course participants are ranked separately on an Orange Rankings list. Score-O, Street-O, Caneo-O, and other non-standard-O are not used in the rankings. Groups get ranked only if they have the same team members each time. The Rossmoor Bar Green and Red courses were not included because of a missing control.
Mathematical Goings-on
The rankings are calculated in two steps. The first step is used to calculate course difficulties; the second step is used to calculate the final rankings points for an individual. In the first half of the process, course difficulties are determined. Speed points on a course are supposed to be proportional to the orienteering speed of a competitor. Thus, if someone finishes a course in half the time of someone else, they will get twice as many points. That's the easy part.
The tricky part is figuring out how different courses compare, so that people who don't run directly against each other can be ranked side by side. One way to do this is to give each course a difficulty level or "gnarliness value" (GV). This way, the harder a course is, the more points you get for finishing it in a certain time.
It's very difficult (if not impossible) to determine the difficulty (or GV) of a course just by looking at how long or steep it is, so instead we use an estimate based on how all the competitors did. We don't directly ask each competitor how hard they thought the course was, because that would be subjective. What we do is compare how long they took with how fast they usually are to determine how hard they "experienced" the course to be.
The exact rules are even less readable than the above:
- The course difficulty or "Gnarliness Value" (GV) is equal to the average (harmonic mean) of the "Personal Gnarliness Values" (PGVs) "experienced" by each finisher.
- The PGV for each finisher is the competitor's average speed multiplied by the competitor's time on the course, in minutes. (E.g., if James is twice as fast as Joe, and James takes half as long as Joe, they both will have the same PGV for the course.)
- A competitor's average speed is the average of their speed on each course finished.
- A finisher's speed on a course is equal to the course difficulty (GV) divided by the finisher's time. (E.g., if Marsha finishes in half the time of Wyatt, Marsha's "speed" on the course will be twice as high as Wyatt's.)
If you study that list of rules, you might notice that this ranking system is circular. The competitors' speeds are based on the GVs, which are based on the PGVs, which are based on the competitors' speeds. Most systems get around this difficulty by determining the course gnarliness values (GVs) using the previous year's rankings as the competitors' speeds for the initial step.
The Iteration rankings are not based on previous years' rankings, which means that the 1994 rankings are based only on the 1994 finishes. This makes the process circular, which requires you to start with some speeds, then calculate all the way through and get new speeds, and do this again and again until the numbers stop changing.
Once the numbers settle, you have a GV for each course. Then, for each competitor, you add back in their DNFs and DQs, giving them a very slow penalty time for the course, then calculate all of their scores, and average the top 75 percent of these to come up with the ranking points for the competitor.
Highlights of the Results
The stats: 672 races by 194 different people on 50 courses at 17 days of orienteering events.
We had 194 different advanced-course competitors this year, without having an A-meet to attract out-of-town orienteers (that's up from 117 last year). Of these, 81 raced 3 or more times. We're definitely doing something right!
Other highlights:
- Congratulations to Derek & Stephanie MacLean and Evan Custer, for competing in 15 out of 16 possible advanced days. Tom Strat, Steve Gregg, and Bob Cooley were right behind them with 14 days each.
- You can figure out your score on any given day by dividing the course difficulty by your finish time in minutes.
- If one race were enough to be ranked, Nils Bergmann's Annadel Blue time would have put him in 5th, and if 2 races were enough, Lans Taylor would have fit in right ahead of him.
- James Scarborough is doing extremely well, despite the fact that he only competed at 4 of 16 events this year. Apparently U.C. Berkeley cross-country and some local training is keeping him in great shape, both physically and mentally.
- Andy Staatz did very well this year, moving up to just barely behind Michael Schmacher and Bruce Wolfe. No doubt he'd have a great shot at winning the M35 national championship next year.
- Penny DeMoss has become much more consistent and faster in the woods, still 1st-place female and now 11th place overall, right behind Tom Strat and Kent Ohlund. With this kind of speed and consistency, Penny may well break into the top 10 female orienteers in the nation.
- Sharon Evans improved dramatically from 1993 to 1994, leaping past several women and threatening to pass the 2nd to 4th ranked women, Stephanie MacLean, Janet Halsebo, and Karen Sessler. But all of these women were also in the Most Improved top 10, so they don't intend to make it easy on her.
- "Hardest course of the year" award goes to Werner Haag and Kent Ohlund, whose Red course at Nisene Marks took 3rd place Michael Schumacher almost 2 hours to complete at over 22 minutes per kilometer. I'm sure that many of you who were there would agree.
- James Scarborough pulled ahead of Bruce Wolfe with an impressive lead of over 13 points. He does have more competition now, with 6 people within 25 points of the lead, as opposed to only one person last year.
- Last year's 3rd-place woman, Heidi Whalen, is nowhere to be seen this year. Last year's 2nd-place woman, Crystine Lee, has become too busy with medical school to continue orienteering, and she too is missing from this years list. In comparison, all of the top 25 men on the list from 1993 were back again in 1994.
- How close is close? Steve Gregg finished .01 above Alan Glendinning. This is equivalent to about 1/2 second faster PER HOUR. (Last year, Alan was 0.1 ahead of Steve....)
1994 Advanced Rankings by Age Class
Left-hand number is overall placement within the combined BAOC advanced rankings.
Rank Name Result '93 Rank Events
F21
45 (1) Stephanie Maclean 57.4 15
53 (2) Karen Sessler 52.4 45 10
58 (3) Sharon Evans 50.2 52 6
F35
49 (1) Janet Halsebo 55.3 46 10
F40
11 (1) Penny DeMoss 86.6 13 8
61 (2) Edith Jacobi 47.6 47 7
68 (3) Patty Clemo 38.5 6
F45
67 (1) Marsha Jacobs 40.9 50 7
70 (2) Lucy DuPertuis 33.5 6
F50
81 (1) Nancy Lindeman 24.5 6
M20
1 (1) James Scarborough 123.5 2 4
M21
3 (1) Michael Schumacher 108.3 4
5 (2) Torben Voetmann 99.9 5
6 (3) Wyatt Riley 99.8 4
12 (4) Derek Maclean 85.3 15
13 (5) Ian Tidswell 84.7 8 3
22 (6) Tapio Karras 76.3 5
23 (7) Darren Irwin 75.8 4
27 (8) Thorsten Graeve 73.5 9
29 (9) Phil Lacroute 70.1 7 6
35 (10) Dan Greene 63.3 32 9
37 (11) Stuart Taylor 62.8 23 4
39 (12) Kennard White 61.5 34 5
42 (13) Bruce Bassett 58.5 3
47 (14) Michael Percy 56.9 41 8
48 (15) Scott Aster 56.6 37 11
52 (16) Keg Alexander 52.5 25 5
55 (17) Roy Want 51.4 7
78 (18) Robert Rich 28.5 3
80 (19) Anthony Manuel 25.7 3
M35
4 (1) Andy Staatz 107.9 6 4
8 (2) Kent Ohlund 94.1 3 12
10 (3) Tom Strat 91.5 5 14
15 (4) Andy Freeberg 82.4 11 4
20 (5) Steve Gregg 76.7 19 14
21 (6) Alan Glendinning 76.7 18 10
25 (7) Dan Clark 75.3 3
36 (8) Finn Arildsen 63.0 7
38 (9) Werner Haag 62.0 27 10
41 (10) Michael Poulsen 60.2 4
57 (11) Kenneth Brown 50.5 4
60 (12) Brian Battuello 47.8 5
63 (13) Tony Pinkham 45.3 4
73 (14) Jeff Lanam 32.0 3
75 (15) Steve Beuerman 31.1 5
M40
2 (1) Bruce Wolfe 110.2 1 5
14 (2) Gary Kraght 82.5 15 9
17 (3) Mark Petersen 81.1 9 8
19 (4) Stephen Miller 78.9 4
34 (5) Gavin Wyatt-Mair 63.4 24 10
40 (6) Mark Blair 60.9 29 10
43 (7) Peter Graube 57.6 43 10
51 (8) Christian Jacobi 52.8 36 7
54 (9) Jim Thompson 52.3 3
59 (10) Lars Borg 48.3 3
M45
9 (1) Ron Hudson 93.8 4 5
16 (2) Gary Carpenter 81.5 20 12
18 (3) Dennis Wildfogel 79.8 12 11
26 (4) George Minarik 74.5 16 12
30 (5) Steve Smith 68.2 4
56 (6) Greg Lee 50.8 4
62 (7) Steve Boyack 46.5 4
65 (8) Nick Corsano 43.6 26 3
M50
28 (1) Evan Custer 70.4 21 15
31 (2) Bob Cooley 68.1 14 14
44 (3) Michael Fleishman 57.5 30 8
64 (4) Dwight Freund 44.7 6
66 (5) Vic Revenko 42.1 48 7
69 (6) John Miller 34.2 53 4
79 (7) Gerald de Wit 27.9 55 5
M55
24 (1) Joe Scarborough 75.7 10 4
32 (2) Ron Gross 65.9 22 12
46 (3) Harold DeMoss 57.0 38 9
M60
71 (1) Don Harrington 32.6 54 5
Groups
50 (1) Theo Verhoeven &
Paul Vermissen 53.9 4
74 (2) Susan White &
Richard Asano 31.5 4
76 (3) Aron & Robert Walker 30.8 3
Unknown
7 (-) Andy Quickfall 99.2 3
33 (-) Reed Benet 65.7 5
72 (-) Ed Bolen 32.2 4
77 (-) Nora Ernst 29.4 3
1994 Advanced Rankings, Combined
Rank in parentheses is rank within age class.
Rank Name Class Result Events 93 Rank
1 (1) James Scarborough M20 123.5 4 2
2 (1) Bruce Wolfe M40 110.2 5 1
3 (1) Michael Schumacher M21 108.3 4
4 (1) Andy Staatz M35 107.9 4 6
5 (2) Torben Voetmann M21 99.9 5
6 (3) Wyatt Riley M21 99.8 4
7 (1) Andy Quickfall Unknown 99.2 3
8 (2) Kent Ohlund M35 94.1 12 3
9 (1) Ron Hudson M45 93.8 5 4
10 (3) Tom Strat M35 91.5 14 5
11 (1) Penny DeMoss F40 86.6 8 13
12 (4) Derek Maclean M21 85.3 15
13 (5) Ian Tidswell M21 84.7 3 8
14 (2) Gary Kraght M40 82.5 9 15
15 (4) Andy Freeberg M35 82.4 4 11
16 (2) Gary Carpenter M45 81.5 12 20
17 (3) Mark Petersen M40 81.1 8 9
18 (3) Dennis Wildfogel M45 79.8 11 12
19 (4) Stephen Miller M40 78.9 4
20 (5) Steve Gregg M35 76.7 14 19
21 (6) Alan Glendinning M35 76.7 10 18
22 (6) Tapio Karras M21 76.3 5
23 (7) Darren Irwin M21 75.8 4
24 (1) Joe Scarborough M55 75.7 4 10
25 (7) Dan Clark M35 75.3 3
26 (4) George Minarik M45 74.5 12 16
27 (8) Thorsten Graeve M21 73.5 9
28 (1) Evan Custer M50 70.4 15 21
29 (9) Phil Lacroute M21 70.1 6 7
30 (5) Steve Smith M45 68.2 4
31 (2) Bob Cooley M50 68.1 14 14
32 (2) Ron Gross M55 65.9 12 22
33 (2) Reed Benet Unknown 65.7 5
34 (5) Gavin Wyatt-Mair M40 63.4 10 24
35 (10) Dan Greene M21 63.3 9 32
36 (8) Finn Arildsen M35 63.0 7
37 (11) Stuart Taylor M21 62.8 4 23
38 (9) Werner Haag M35 62.0 10 27
39 (12) Kennard White M21 61.5 5 34
40 (6) Mark Blair M40 60.9 10 29
41 (10) Michael Poulsen M35 60.2 4
42 (13) Bruce Bassett M21 58.5 3
43 (7) Peter Graube M40 57.6 10 43
44 (3) Michael Fleishman M50 57.5 8 30
45 (1) Stephanie Maclean F21 57.4 15
46 (3) Harold DeMoss M55 57.0 9 38
47 (14) Michael Percy M21 56.9 8 41
48 (15) Scott Aster M21 56.6 11 37
49 (1) Janet Halsebo F35 55.3 10 46
50 (1) Theo Verhoeven &
Paul Vermissen Group 53.9 4
51 (8) Christian Jacobi M40 52.8 7 36
52 (16) Keg Alexander M21 52.5 5 25
53 (2) Karen Sessler F21 52.4 10 45
54 (9) Jim Thompson M40 52.3 3
55 (17) Roy Want M21 51.4 7
56 (6) Greg Lee M45 50.8 4
57 (11) Kenneth Brown M35 50.5 4
58 (3) Sharon Evans F21 50.2 6 52
59 (10) Lars Borg M40 48.7 3
60 (12) Brian Battuello M35 47.8 5
61 (2) Edith Jacobi F40 47.6 7 47
62 (7) Steve Boyack M45 46.5 4
63 (13) Tony Pinkham M35 45.3 4
64 (4) Dwight Freund M50 44.7 6
65 (8) Nick Corsano M45 43.6 3 26
66 (5) Vic Revenko M50 42.1 7 48
67 (1) Marsha Jacobs F45 40.9 7 50
68 (3) Patty Clemo F40 38.5 6
69 (6) John Miller M50 34.2 4 53
70 (2) Lucy DuPertuis F45 33.5 6
71 (1) Don Harrington M60 32.6 5 54
72 (3) Ed Bolen Unknown 32.2 4
73 (14) Jeff Lanam M35 32.0 3
74 (2) Susan White &
Richard Asano Group 31.5 4
75 (15) Steve Beuerman M35 31.1 5
76 (3) Aron &
Robert Walker Group 30.8 3
77 (4) Nora Ernst Unknown 29.4 3
78 (18) Robert Rich M21 28.5 3
79 (7) Gerald de Wit M50 27.9 5 55
80 (19) Anthony Manuel M21 25.7 3
81 (1) Nancy Lindeman F50 24.5 6
Most Improved Advanced Orienteers
The following orienteers showed the most improvement in their performance from 1993 to 1994 on the advanced courses.
Most Improved (top 10)
1994 1993
Name Class Result Result Improvement
Sharon Evans F21 50.2 35.8 +40%
Andy Staatz M35 107.9 92.1 +17%
Janet Halsebo F35 55.3 47.4 +17%
Gary Carpenter M45 81.5 70.8 +15%
Peter Graube M40 57.6 50.8 +13%
Penny DeMoss F40 86.6 77.3 +12%
Karen Sessler F21 52.4 47.6 +10%
Gary Kraght M40 82.5 75.3 +10%
Dan Greene M21 63.3 58.0 +9%
Michael Percy M21 56.9 52.3 +9%
Consistency (top 12)
Calculation: 1 / normalized standard deviation of scores
Name Class Consistency Events
Stuart Taylor M21 34 4
Ron Hudson M45 28 5
Lars Borg M40 26 3
James Scarborough M20 23 4
Michael Schumacher M21 23 4
Andy Freeberg M35 21 4
Joe Scarborough M55 18 4
Bruce Wolfe M40 17 5
Dan Greene M21 17 9
Kent Ohlund M35 15 12
Penny DeMoss F40 15 8
Steve Smith M45 15 4
Highlights of the Orange Results
- 409 finishes by 274 different people or groups on 18 orange courses make up the 1994 orange rankings.
- 37 people and groups finished enough Orange events to be ranked in 1994, as opposed to only 23 last year.
- To check your score, divide the GV by your time (in minutes) at each event to get your score for each event, then take the average of the top 75% of those scores (give yourself 1/2 the score of the slowest finisher for a DNF or MSP).
- Rankings do not correspond directly to advanced rankings, but dividing by 19 will give you a rough estimate of where you'd fit in the advanced rankings.
- 13-year old-Sarah Minarik's 943 points on Orange corresponds to approximately 50 points in the advanced rankings. This would put her at 6th woman overall, less than 20% behind 2nd-place Stephanie Maclean. If she continues to improve, she may end up in the top 2 or 3 women in the club in 1995.
- Mike Landucci jumped from 18th in 1993 to 8th in 1994, coming in as most improved on Orange.
- At Joaquin Miller in June, where Orange was the hardest course offered, 3rd-place advanced orienteer Michael Schumacher earned nearly 2000 points for his winning run.
- Meg Gerstner showed up often enough to be ranked both individually and in a group with Lisa Gattuso. That's a total of 9 orange events for her (most in the club), follow closely by Eleanor Gross-Lightfoot with 8, and Nancy Lindeman with 7.
- 6 competitors from the 1993 Orange rankings and 7 competitors from the 1994 Orange rankings have moved up to be ranked in the 1994 Advanced Rankings as well. Marsha Jacobs, Nancy Lindeman, and Don Harrington, all moved up to 1st place in BAOC in their respective categories.
- A new field called "typical time" is the expected time for that person on an Orange course with a GV of 60000.
Orange Course Rankings
Typical # of 94
Rank Name Result Time Events 93 Rank
1 Alan Mathews 1033 58:04 3
2 Ramana Yerneni 1024 58:36 3
3 Sarah Minarik 943 63:36 5
4 Oleg Shakhnovsky 902 66:32 3
5 Rick Boyer 894 67:08 4 7
6 Michael Poulsen 879 68:13 3
7 Brian Battuello 828 72:27 6
8 Mike Landucci 809 74:07 3 18
9 Anthony Pinkham 808.41 74:13.2 3 10
10 Franziska Haag 808.36 74:13.4 6 14
11 Bill Straka 798 75:08 3
12 Keith Krieger &
Darcy Richardson 784 76:33 3
13 Marsha Jacobs 774 77:31 4 15
14 Jasper Wu 756 79:21 4
15 Paul Li 751 79:55 4 16
16 Lisa Wylie 732 81:57 3 19
17 Joe Papendick 717 83:39 3
18 Alan Kamas 688 87:15 5
19 Chris H. Comfort 679 88:23 4
20 Jeff Lanam 674 89:00 6 17
21 Robert Rich 663 90:28 3
22 Kathy Tappers &
Brian Frew 656 91:30 3
23 Eleanor Gross-Lightfoot 654 91:45 8
24 Jon Gibbons &
Steve Papa 641 93:38 3
25 Leslie Minarik 639 93:53 3
26 Steve Minniear 628 95:32 3
27 Jascha Lee 625 96:02 3
28 Ken Livak 619 96:55 4
29 Meg Gerstner 593 101:06 6
30 Jasper Wu &
Reggie Dugard 592 101:23 3
31 Carolyn & Chris Cobey 570.3 105:12 3
32 Don Harrington 569.5 105:21 3
33 Valerie Doyle 539 111:24 3
34 Nancy Lindeman 513 116:55 7 22
35 Carol Irwin 417 143:55 3
36 Marc Bernstein 349 171:47 3
37 Lisa Gattuso &
Meg Gerstner 331 181:32 3
Most Improved Orange Orienteers
1993 Orange Competitors
1993 1994 1994
Orange Adv. Adv.
Rank Name Rank Score
10 Tony Pinkham 63 (13) 45.3
11 Dwight Freund 64 (4) 44.7
3 Patty Clemo 68 (3) 38.5
17 Jeff Lanam 73 (14) 32.0
12 Steve Beuerman 75 (15) 31.1
22 Nancy Lindeman 81 (1) 24.5
1994 Orange Competitors
1994 1994 1994
Orange Adv. Adv.
Rank Name Rank Score
6 Michael Poulsen 41 (10) 60.2
7 Brian Battuello 60 (12) 47.8
9 Tony Pinkham 63 (13) 45.3
13 Marsha Jacobs 67 (1) 40.9
32 Don Harrington 71 (1) 32.6
20 Jeff Lanam 73 (14) 32.0
21 Robert Rich 78 (18) 28.5
34 Nancy Lindeman 81 (1) 24.5
Advanced Course Difficulties
GV Event Description
6631 Huddart Jan 16 1994 GREEN 4.3 Km 400 Meter Climb 12 Controls
7883 Huddart Jan 16 1994 RED 5.4 Km 470 Meter Climb 14 Controls
9352 Huddart Jan 16 1994 BLUE 6.3 Km 540 Meter Climb 16 Controls
4166 Shell Ridge Feb 13 1994 GREEN COURSE 4.5km 265m 12 controls
5896 Shell Ridge Feb 13 1994 RED COURSE 5.6km 390m 13 controls
7562 Shell Ridge Feb 13 1994 BLUE COURSE 7.6km 490m 16 controls
6022 Las Trampas Feb. 27 1994 Green 3.8 km 300 m 9 controls
7099 Las Trampas Feb. 27 1994 Red 4.6 km 340 m 12 controls
8436 Las Trampas Feb. 27 1994 Blue 5.7 km 420 m 14 controls
4088 Calero Reservoir March 13, 1994 Brown Course 3.8 km 260 m 8 controls
5422 Calero Reservoir March 13, 1994 Green Course 5.0 km 310 m 10 controls
8472 Calero Reservoir March 13, 1994 Red Course 6.8 km 375 m 16 controls
4305 Annadel Mar 27 1994 Brown 3.1 k
5776 Annadel Mar 27 1994 Green 4.3 k
8182 Annadel Mar 27 1994 Red 6.1 k
10565 Annadel Mar 27 1994 Blue 7.7 k
4830 Sunol Apr 10 1994 Brown
4407 Sunol Apr 10 1994 Green
6451 Sunol Apr 10 1994 Red
8549 Sunol Apr 10 1994 Blue
5227 Indian Valley April 24 1994 Green course 3.8 km 280 m climb 8 controls
6617 Indian Valley April 24 1994 Red course 4.9 km 360 m climb 11 controls
8952 Indian Valley April 24 1994 Blue course 6.2 km 480 m climb 15 controls
7158 Doton's Point May 1 1994 Green 5.5 km 100 m
10089 Doton's Point May 1 1994 Blue 8.4 km 160 m
4536 Joseph Grant May 22, 1994 Brown course 3.5 km 230 m climb 9 controls
5482 Joseph Grant May 22, 1994 Green course 4.3 km 260 m climb 10 controls
6494 Joseph Grant May 22, 1994 Red course 5.5 km 335 m climb 13 controls
8725 Joseph Grant May 22, 1994 Blue course 6.9 km 440 m climb 17 controls
4556 Nisene Marks June 19, 1994 Brown 3.1 km 170 m 9 controls
6718 Nisene Marks June 19, 1994 Green 3.8 km 250 m 9 controls
11115 Nisene Marks June 19, 1994 Red 5.2 km 315 m 13 controls
5576 Boreal Ridge, August 21, 1994 Green 4.8km, 150m 10 controls
7275 Boreal Ridge, August 21, 1994 Red 6.5km 240m 11 controls
8375 Boreal Ridge, August 21, 1994 Blue 8.1km 305m 15 controls
5761 China Camp, October 16, 1994, Green 4.7 k 322 m
7761 China Camp, October 16, 1994, Red 5.5 k 387 m
7459 China Camp, October 16, 1994, Blue 6.3 k 427 m
6814 BIG BASIN BLUE Sunday, October 23, 1994 5.2 km 345 m 12 controls
7127 BIG BASIN RED Sunday, October 23, 1994 4.2 km 300 m 12 controls
5469 BIG BASIN GREEN Sunday, October 23, 1994 3.7 km 260 m 10 controls
10243 Briones 11/6/94 BLUE / 6.1 km, 530 m, 12 controls
8816 Briones 11/6/94 RED / 5.2 km, 460 m, 11 controls
6929 Briones 11/6/94 GREEN / 4.9 km, 380 m, 10 controls
5062 Briones 11/6/94 BROWN / 3.9 km, 270 m, 8 controls
3897 Spring Lake 11/20/94 Brown, 3.82 km. 185 m 10 controls
6507 Bon Tempe 12/17/94 Red Course 5.3K 300m climb 13 controls
6114 Bon Tempe 12/18/94 Red Course 5.3K 300m climb 13 controls
3170 Bon Tempe 12/17/94 Brown Course 3.2K 190m climb 9 controls
2694 Bon Tempe 12/18/94 Brown Course 3.2K 190m climb 9 controls
Orange Course Difficulties
GV Event Description
84251 Huddart, Jan. 16, 1994 ORANGE 2.9 Km, 310 Meter Climb, 10 Controls
63528 Shell Ridge, Feb. 13, 1994, ORANGE 3.8 km 245 m 10 controls
84660 Las Trampas, Feb. 27, 1994 Orange 3.1 km 200 m 8 controls
68331 Calero Reservoir March 13, 1994 Orange Course 4.0 km 210 m 9 controls
69288 Annadel 3/27/94, Orange 4.0 k
77047 Sunol, Apr. 10, 1994 Orange 3.8 km 210m
63906 Indian Valley, April 24, 1994, Orange 3.3 km, 215 m, 10 controls
54386 Doton's Point, May 1, 1994 Orange 4.3 km
61822 Joseph Grant 5/22/94 Orange 3.1 km, 165 m climb 10 controls
72164 Joaquin Miller, June 4, 1994 Orange
61552 Boreal, August 21, 1994, Orange 3.2 km 140 m 10 controls
80810 Morgan Territory, Sept. 25, 1994 Orange 4.3 km, 700 feet, 11 Controls
66279 Rossmoor Bar, Oct. 9, 1994 Orange 4.2 km 20m 11 controls
71641 China Camp, October 16, 1994 Orange 4.0 k 220 m
89236 BIG BASIN October 23, 1994 ORANGE 3.0 km 245 m 9 controls
62845 Briones 11/6/94 ORANGE / 3.0 km, 220 m, 8 controls
79851 Spring Lake 11/94 Orange, 4.1 km. 205 m. 10 controls
40726 Bon Tempe 12/17/94 Yellow/Orange Course 3.1K 120m climb 8 controls